|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
   |
Posted - 2007.10.13 09:17:00 -
[1]
I actually like this idea. It would be nice if we could have in-game battlefields feature. Sign up with random teammates or arranged teammates for a battlefield event and pew pew. Winners at the end of the event split the loot.
There is risk vs reward. Risk - you consensually go in with a winning build (T2 or faction mods) and reward - if you win, you get to split loot without them taken away by who's first to collect loot.
They way I see it, everyone wins. A lot of looting, multiplayer competitive combat and fun.
---------
Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng.
I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |
Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.10.13 10:57:00 -
[2]
Why wouldn't battlefields be a bad idea?
Battlefields are good in this game. The game mechanics are already there. Enter deadspace or acceleration gate and your team would be in level 1 of the battlefield. Win the battlefield, proceed until the next battlefield until your team have won the event battlefield and be the king of the hill.
I am sure griefing pirates or alliance lackeys would initially say no to battlefields but once they are in the game, they would participate in them. Battlefields give consensual engagements - no need to camp low secs for hours or wait in null-secs for hours and get no engagements. You login into the game, get a gang or wait into a queue to enter battlefields.
If griefing pirates or alliance lackeys do not want to play battlefields, there is nothing to worry. I am sure, we empire people would participate them.
You fight in the battlefields and if your team wins, everyone receives automatic loot split. Market is still present to support battlefield warfare. Players still lose ISKs in battlefields. Players could have ladder play - e-sports or pro-gaming when they score kill points.
CCP could implement this battlefield rules:
1) A battlefield game can be a solo or a 4v4 arranged team or random team game.
2) A battlefield event consists of 8 random solo players or arranged/random teams to start with. They are like group A, B, C and D.
3) At the start, everyone will fight at level 1 of the deadspace. Winners of level 1 will proceed to level 2, etc.
4) There is a timer at every level and if nobody wins, then the winner is the one who scored the most damage in the engagement.
Losers will have their ships automatically destroyed. If there is a draw, nobody gets destroyed and are kicked out of battlefields.
Any player receiving 2 draws a day will be banned from battlefields for 24 hours. This is to prevent time wasters from ruining game play for other players.
Players will need webs and warp scramblers to hold opponents to pew pew. Holding opponents are important because if there is a draw, the tie breaker is the player who scores the most damage in the round.
5) Winners of battlefields, the kings of the hill would receive bonus kill points and loot from losers in current and previous levels.
To be honest, I think it is all good for everyone. It definitely beats waiting for kills.
---------
Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng.
I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |
Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.10.13 11:21:00 -
[3]
What utter nonsense. If I want cold, I go into an air-conditioned room. If I want hot, I stand besides a heater. If you don't want heater, you can stay in the cold side of the room.
You don't have to participate in battlefields if you don't want to. You are like those people who are anti-ambulation, don't dock if you don't want to see your toon.
---------
Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng.
I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |
Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.10.13 13:12:00 -
[4]
What is so fail with arenas? I do not understand this slang.
---------
Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng.
I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |
Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.10.13 15:16:00 -
[5]
They could have friends nearby.
Anyway, I still haven't seen any good reason that anti-arena campers are so against adding a new game play into the game other than can't kill easily because engagements are consensual.
Maybe this game is really meant for players to grieVe-online.
Sighs. I do not know should I continue or stop posting because the community is into non-consensually unfair game play. I can't decide. Oh well, I let the pro and anti arena campers to decide. I will continue to post for fair game play if the pro-arena people ask me to fight for their side or else I will stop fighting for fair game play.
The first 50 wins.
---------
Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng.
I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |
Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.10.14 11:17:00 -
[6]
mitsuko, arenas combat are not 100% fair. You can enter in a faction ship and fight a T1 ship and you would win because you have the unfair advantage. The point of arena combat is consensual combat. A place to have fun and learn without worries about lame play.
---------
Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng.
I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |
Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.10.15 09:56:00 -
[7]
Amarria Black, excuse me, where in my post I said lossless arena?
---------
Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng.
I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |
Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.10.15 10:29:00 -
[8]
Amarria Black, you did not read and yet you could conclude I asked for lossless arena. If you had read the post, I am advocating an arena where losers would lose their ships. What is lossless about that?
---------
Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng.
I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |
Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.10.15 11:52:00 -
[9]
Your apologies are accepted, Amarria Black. This time. :)
---------
Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng.
I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |
|
|
| |
|